Professional/Selective Outrage

Professional outrage:

Certain women and men know the groupthink cells (people who share the same context due to 

ideology and/or gender agenda) will follow them blindly if they use the correct dog 

whistles. 

Dog-whistle politics is political messaging employing coded language that appears to mean 

one thing to the general population but has an additional, different or more specific 

resonance for a targeted subgroup.

When the terms "thug", "welfare queen", "fatherless", and/or "rape culture" are used, you 

can pretty much figure out where the article is going before you complete the first 

paragraph. It's a shame these disingenuous tactics work, but people haven't evolved past 

groupthink yet. Momentum can MAKE things right even if there are no facts backing up the 

Whistle Blower's stance. Even then, facts can be manufactured and stats can be skewed.

Anybody can be painted into a villain, using their own off-color commentary and everybody 

else's perception of it-outside of the original context of the statement. 

We should monitor this behavior.