Professional/Selective Outrage

Professional outrage:
Certain women and men know the groupthink cells (people who share the same context due to 
ideology and/or gender agenda) will follow them blindly if they use the correct dog 
Dog-whistle politics is political messaging employing coded language that appears to mean 
one thing to the general population but has an additional, different or more specific 
resonance for a targeted subgroup.
When the terms "thug", "welfare queen", "fatherless", and/or "rape culture" are used, you 
can pretty much figure out where the article is going before you complete the first 
paragraph. It's a shame these disingenuous tactics work, but people haven't evolved past 
groupthink yet. Momentum can MAKE things right even if there are no facts backing up the 
Whistle Blower's stance. Even then, facts can be manufactured and stats can be skewed.
Anybody can be painted into a villain, using their own off-color commentary and everybody 
else's perception of it-outside of the original context of the statement. 
We should monitor this behavior.